January 26 GOP Florida Debate Recap: “It’s Not Worth Getting Angry About” Edition

The music and lead-in to this debate were reminiscent of the lead-ins to the NFL play-off games. And indeed, since there will be not be another 2012 GOP debate for another month (or possibly ever), this debate took on the feeling of a titanic struggle to reach the political Superbowl–the GOP nomination for the presidency.

So how did the candidates do? The clear winner by every measure was Rick Santorum. While his last several debates have been quite good, until tonight he never had a debate moment. In this debate, he had several. Mitt Romney took some hard body blows, but gave as well as he got, and was still standing after the debate. Ron Paul was nearly a nonentity on the stage, though he did have a debate moment when he challenged Newt Gingrich on his talk about having balanced the budget. Newt Gingrich simply stepped in it–several times. He pulled the same debate tactics that he has pulled in every debate thus far, and in each case his words either landed on the stage with a thud, or he was devastated by his opponent’s response.

In a normal situation, one would think that Newt Gingrich’s political career was over–his performance was that bad. But there has been nothing normal about this political season. One thing is true, however, and was illustrated handily in this debate: Gingrich is not and never has been the conservative alternative to Romney. Santorum is. And conservatives need to stop wasting time with Gingrich and get behind Santorum unless they want to see Romney get the nomination.

__________

The debate began with a major skirmish between Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich on illegal immigration. Whatever one thinks of their respective proposals, Gingrich came off quite poorly in the exchange. Gingrich attempted to distort Romney’s position, and Romney simply would not have any of it.

Romney fumbled the next question about an ad that his campaign had out saying that Gingrich called Spanish “the language of the ghetto”. Apparently, Gingrich did in fact imply this, but did not say it directly. Nevertheless, Romney was caught flat-footed.

On Latin America, Ron Paul would normalize relations with Cuba. Rick Santorum came out swinging in this issue, however. He used Honduras–a country that is close to my heart–as an example of Barack Obama’s failed policies in the region.

On housing, Romney attacked Gingrich for his work for Freddie Mac. Gingrich replied by accusing Romney of having shares in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This was an unfair and unwise attack, as Gingrich had to have known that Romney’s investments are in mutual funds and through a blind trust. Romney turned this attack around against Gingrich to devastating effect, pointing out that Gingrich had himself invested in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through mutual funds.

Ron Paul and Rick Santorum tried to get back to the issue at hand–the housing crisis. Santorum scolded both Romney and Gingrich for squabbling about trivia, and challenged them to “focus on the issues”. In all of the debates, Santorum has been looking for a moment to shine. This was it.

Wolf Blitzer then went after Gingrich on his criticism of Romney over his personal finances. Gingrich tried to turn this against Blitzer, and it blew up in his face.

Both Gingrich and Santorum defended the use of taxes to encourage investment. Paul wanted to repeal the 16th Amendment altogether. Paul then challenged the other candidates to a 25-mile bike ride, but no one took him up on it.

On NASA, Romney wants to keep the space program going, but does not want to build a colony on the Moon, as Gingrich proposes. Gingrich thinks that building a colony on the Moon would not break the bank, as he would finance it through the private sector. Santorum is in favor of the space program, but thinks that Gingrich’s Moon proposal–along with many other of his proposals–is irresponsible from a financial perspective. Paul would like to send some politicians to the Moon. As a final remark on the subject, Romney hammered Gingrich on this–and many of his ideas–essentially accusing him of pandering.

Gingrich defended himself by saying that one did not have to be a cheap skate to balance the budget, as after all he had balanced the budget four times previously. Paul then pointed out that all of this balanced budget talk from Gingrich is really not what it cracks up to be, as the national debt went up during that time.

On health care for people without insurance, Paul pointed out that medical costs have risen because of government involvement in medicine since the 1960s. Romney and Gingrich want to reform the health care system and get the economy going again. Santorum hammered Gingrich and Romney for flip-flopping after both having supported the individual mandate, and then went on to point out that Romneycare is identical to Obamacare. Both Gingrich and Romney tried to rebut Santorum, but Santorum went head to head with them, and got the better of the exchange.  This is where Romney uttered the most ill-fated words of this election season: “It’s not worth getting angry about.” Even though Romney went on to do a good job of delineating the differences between Romneycare and Obamacare, this was a disastrous unforced error on his part.

There was a softball question about which Hispanic-American the candidates would want in their cabinet. (Why not ask what color they like? Or favorite song?) Then there was the epic in inanity: “Why would your wife make a good first lady?” However, at least Santorum made good use of this by talking about family values.

There was then a hardball question to Romney about how he viewed Ronald Reagan back in the day, and he admitted that he was not politically sophisticated at the time. A good answer. Gingrich wrapped himself in the Reagan flag, and accused Romney of stirring up talk that Gingrich was not as close to Reagan as he claimed. Gingrich then noted that Romney voted for Paul Tsongas. Incredibly, Romney countered that he never voted for a Democrat when there was a Republican on the ballot.

The debate turned back to Cuba, and Santorum once again stood against normalizing ties. Paul wants to improve relations with Cuba. Romney and Gingrich basically agreed with Santorum.

On the issue of Palestine, Romney blamed the problem on Hamas, Fatah, and the Palestinian leaders and their belief that Israel does not have a right to exist. He then went on to attack Obama’s policy on Israel. Gingrich repeated the nonsense that the Palestinian people was a concept invented in the 1970s, and then went on to advocate moving the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Otherwise, he agreed with Romney.

On Puerto Rico, Santorum noted that Puerto Ricans should be able to decide whether they should become a state, but that more aid should be given to Puerto Rico.

On religious beliefs, Paul said that they would not affect his political decisions. Romney harkened back to Judeo-Christian values, noting that many of our ideas of freedom come from these values. Gingrich thinks that the president should seek God. He says that he is running for president because there has been a war against Christians in the US.  Santorum expanded upon what Romney said, talking at length about how the foundation of our country is in God-given rights. This was another point in the debate where Santorum really shined.

Blitzer then asked why the candidates are electable. Paul noted that he does well in national polls against Obama. Romney thought that he was more appealing as a candidate because he is an outsider. Gingrich cited his past record. Santorum said that he was simply a better candidate than the others, and then talked about how both Romney and Gingrich have varied from conservative principles. He feels that with his interest in reviving manufacturing in the US, he would be the best candidate to bring Reagan Democrats back into the GOP fold.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Another Stimulus-Backed Energy Company Files for Bankruptcy

From the Foundry:

After months of financial turmoil, an Energy Department-backed lithium ion battery company has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
The company, Ener1, received a $118 million grant from DOE in 2010 as part of the president’s stimulus package. The money, which went to Ener1 subsidiary EnerDel, aimed to promote renewable energy storage battery technology for electrical grid use.
But despite generous federal support for the company, Ener1 was racked by problems last year. In October, NASDAQ delisted the company due to non-compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission filing requirements. A month later, the company’s president, chief executive, and top financial officer were fired.
On Thursday, Ener1 announced it will initiate a pre-packaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan as part of an agreement to restructure the company’s debt obligations …
Ener1 is not the first energy storage technology company to file for Chapter 11 after receiving significant stimulus support. Beacon Power, which manufactures flywheel energy storage technology, received a $43 million loan guarantee from the same stimulus program that funded Solyndra. Despite having used $3 million marked for loan repayment to continue funding its daily operations, Beacon filed for Chapter 11 in November.

(H/t ARRA News Service)

The stimulus money Solyndra received turned out to be little more than a political payoff. No doubt, the DOE grants that Ener1 received will turn out to be the same.

That is a scandal.

Yet, even if there were no scandal associated with these DOE grants, they would still be wrong. Obama and his team claim that they had the right ideas, but that these ideas failed because the government did not spend enough money. This is ridiculous: Obama’s ideas were flawed from the outset.

With the stimulus, Obama and his team agreed with Paul Krugman that any government spending–even if it is merely to pay someone to dig a hole and then fill it back in again–would be helpful to the economy. Such a view is so simplistic and wrongheaded that even John Keynes would have disagreed with it. Surely, this policy did not help Japan or other countries which have tried it, so Obama and his team should have known better. Government spending simply for the sake of spending only wastes money and runs up the government dept.

On top of this, Obama and his team believed that they could second-guess the marketplace. However, there is little market for overpriced and under-performing green products, and there never will be, no matter how much money the government throws at the problem. Indeed, the government only succeeded in propping up failed business plans, to the detriment of companies which are truly innovative and cutting edge. And in the end, the companies the government propped up still went bust.

Barack Obama: ethically wrong, wrong on government debt, wrong on the economy, and wrong on crony capitalism. How can the country survive another four years of this man?

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Romney: “It’s Not Worth Getting Angry About”

If Romneycare Obamacare is not worth getting angry about, what is?

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

A Tale of Two NY Elections: Newt Versus Mitt

Many people who count themselves as part of the Tea Party are now coming out in favor of Newt Gingrich. They must have very short memories. While none of the surviving GOP candidates have ever been a part of the Tea Party movement, none have been as hostile to it as Newt Gingrich. Indeed, in October 2009, Newt Gingrich threw both the Tea Party and social conservatives under the bus when he supported Dede Scozzafava in the special election to fill the House seat vacated when John McHugh became Secretary of the Army. The seat was reliably Republican, so there seemed no danger of a loss to the Democrats, until the state party establishment and Newt Gingrich stepped in. As I wrote at the time:

The proposed Republican replacement for McHugh is Dede Scozzafava, who was selected as the GOP candidate by the 11 Republican county chairmen from the 23rd District over another, conservative candidate. Scozzafava currently serves in the New York Assembly. Her opponents claim that she is a tax and spend liberal, but this may be overstated. On the other hand, by her own admission she is solidly pro-abortion and pro-gay rights. In past elections, she received support from the Working Families Party, which is closely aligned with ACORN. In her current campaign, she is receiving much of her support from the unions, and has been endorsed by the Daily Kos. Were it not for the (R) after her name, voters would be excused from thinking that she was not the Democrat candidate for office on election day. Yet, if her political views and affiliations were not enough to brand her as a Democrat in Republican’s clothing, her personal associations are certainly more what one would expect of a Democrat Congresswoman, rather than a Republican. In the past, she was listed as an officer in a company called Seaway Capitol Partners, which is run by her brother. Though she herself claims to be no longer affiliated with Seaway, her campaign website lists her as the VP of the company. Naturally, Seaway has nearly $200,000 of liens against it for non-payment of federal and state taxes.
What were the Republican county chairmen thinking when they selected her? Indeed, when they made their selection, the GOP assumed that her Democrat opponent would be Darrel Aubertine, a state senator who is a social conservative. So, effectively the local GOP establishment chose to run a social liberal against a social conservative in a socially conservative district. They could have easily selected someone who was more conservative than her, and still kept the seat. Indeed, her Democrat opponent, Bill Owens, had not even bothered registering as a Democrat until he was selected as the Democrat candidate, and he has carefully avoided nearly all hot-button political issues, apart from his support for health-care reform. He may well be more conservative than Scozzafava on most issues, but, given his silence, without a track record it is difficult to tell. There was absolutely no reason for the local GOP to turn left in this by-election, especially when Obama is not on the ticket and is currently in a free-fall at the polls. The only explanation is that they themselves are not that conservative, and saw the by-election as an opportunity to put a more liberal candidate in office without having to go through the mess of holding a primary election …
Apart from GOP functionaries, the highest profile Republican to come out in support of Scozzafava is Newt Gingrich, because it is “what Ronald Reagan would do.”

The situation inflamed conservatives nationwide to the point that they actively began supporting a third candidate, Doug Hoffman, over Scoffafava. All of the presumed presidential candidates got involved, and all supported Hoffman with the exception of Gingrich, who stuck with Scoffafava until she dropped out of the race. Not only did Gingrich support Scoffafava, but he was dismissive of her critics and went out of his way to demean and belittle those who disagreed with him in this issue. In the end, Scoffafava threw her support behind her erstwhile Democratic opponent, Bill Owens. Owens ended up winning the seat, and voting for Obamacare. Gingrich claimed before the election that a vote for Hoffman was a vote for Pelosi. This was simply not true, and never was the case–the only reliable vote against liberalism in this election was a vote for Hoffman.

The Lonely Conservative picks up the story from there:

Not too long after that, Mitt Romney got involved in an upstate New York election. Republican newcomer Ann Marie Buerkle was running against incumbent Democrat Dan Maffei whose campaign was flush with cash. Buerkle’s campaign operated on a shoe string budget with a mostly volunteer campaign staff and a horde of volunteers known as the Buerkle Brigade. Her campaign operated out of a little store front down the street from where I live. Her campaign didn’t get very much national attention, with the exception of a few bloggers, myself included. (I live in the district.) Nobody thought she would win. I followed that race closely. I don’t recall an instance of Newt Gingrich getting involved. But Romney did. He traveled to Central New York to endorse Buerkle and open an RNC sponsored campaign office, and then speak at a Conservative Party dinner. Buerkle miraculously won that election (must have been her pro-life credentials) and has gone on to be the most conservative representative from the NY delegation.
In New York we don’t vote in the primary for months. If Santorum’s still in it when it’s my turn, I’ll probably vote for Santorum. If he’s out, and I have a choice between Newt and Mitt, I will vote for Mitt. I don’t care how many wives Newt’s had, that’s his business. But I question his judgment, and his meddling in New York helped Nancy Pelosi – who he cuddled with on a couch – and President Obama. Romney got involved in New York, and helped the cause of freedom. I just can’t forget it.

There is no more unreliable politician in the US than Newt Gingrich. Though he talks a good game when he is asking for support, for the sake of partisan politics and his career he has always been quick to throw conservatives and the pro-life movement under the bus.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment